AFL 2026 Season Betting Analysis – ATS, Over/Under & Trends
Track the full AFL 2026 season with our progressive betting analysis. View ATS records, over/under trends, team form, and key betting edges as the season unfolds. Click any team to drill down into detailed game-by-game stats and performance data.
Generated at 2026-08-10 00:31:29
Full Match — Favourites ATS
44.97%
Record: 85–104
Full Match — Totals
Over 46.56%
Overs: 88 | Unders: 101
1H Over: 0% (0/0)
Biggest Spread Covered
Carlton Blues
Cover margin: 101.5
Best ATS Team
Melbourne Demons — 71.43%
Worst ATS: Gold Coast Suns — 23.81%
ATS% by Team
Ranked order
Over% by Team
How often team games went Over
Season Story
Through the current AFL campaign, full-match betting trends have painted a clear picture of inconsistency among favourites and a slight lean toward the under in totals. Favourites have posted just 85 covers against 104 losses for a 44.97 percent success rate. This underperformance has created value on underdogs throughout the season. On the totals side, overs have landed in 88 games while unders have hit in 101 contests, translating to a 46.56 percent over rate and 53.44 percent under rate. These figures suggest scoring has remained somewhat suppressed in many matchups, though several high-scoring outbursts have still occurred.
First-half totals markets are not available yet based on the data provided.
Melbourne Demons stand out as the clearest team to back against the spread this season. With a 71.43 percent ATS mark on a 15-6 record, the Demons have comfortably cleared the 52.38 percent threshold required to beat the bookies over a sustained period. Their success has come from a balanced approach, covering six times as favourites and seven times as underdogs. This level of consistency across 21 games has made them the most reliable ATS proposition in the competition at this stage of the season.
The Demons also fit the profile of a strong underdog team, entering games as the dog on ten occasions and securing seven of those wins. Their largest spread cover came in round 10 when they defeated the Hawthorn Hawks 120-81 as 16.5-point favourites, exceeding the spread by 55.5 points. Such performances highlight their ability to generate momentum across quarters and turn close contests into blowouts.
Other notable spread-covering events have further shaped the narrative. Carlton Blues delivered the season’s biggest cover to date, eclipsing the spread by 101.5 points in round 21 against the Brisbane Lions. Fremantle Dockers followed closely with a 99.5-point cover in round 13 versus North Melbourne. These lopsided results underscore the AFL’s capacity for sudden momentum shifts, where one dominant quarter can decide both the final margin and betting outcomes.
At the opposite end, Gold Coast Suns have struggled significantly, managing only a 23.81 percent ATS record. Their single win as an underdog across nine such opportunities illustrates the challenges some clubs face when installed as long shots. Meanwhile, teams like West Coast Eagles have shown resilience despite heavy underdog status on 18 occasions, covering the spread 12 times overall.
These ATS and totals trends carry direct implications for finals positioning. Clubs that have demonstrated quarter-by-quarter discipline, such as the Demons and Dockers, appear better equipped to handle the variance of September. With the season still unfolding, continued monitoring of favourite underperformance and under trends will remain central to identifying value in the weeks ahead.
Team Reviews
Search + click headers to sort
| Rank | Team (ATS L10 >) Rnd 22 | Fav | Dog | Covers as Fav | Wins as Dog | Overs | Unders | Over% | Under% | Biggest Cover | ATS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
|
11 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 12 | 9 | 57.14% | 42.86% |
55.5
vs Hawthorn Hawks
(R10)
|
71.43% |
| 2 |
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
|
18 | 3 | 11 | 2 | 11 | 10 | 52.38% | 47.62% |
99.5
vs North Melbourne Kangaroos
(R13)
|
66.67% |
| 3 |
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
|
16 | 5 | 9 | 2 | 9 | 12 | 42.86% | 57.14% |
63.5
vs Western Bulldogs
(R6)
|
61.90% |
| 4 |
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
|
11 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 10 | 11 | 47.62% | 52.38% |
59.5
vs Essendon Bombers
(R7)
|
57.14% |
| 5 |
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
|
18 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 12 | 9 | 57.14% | 42.86% |
97.5
vs West Coast Eagles
(R4)
|
57.14% |
| 6 |
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
|
3 | 18 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 13 | 38.10% | 61.90% |
46.5
vs Greater Western Sydney Giants
(R10)
|
57.14% |
| 7 |
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
|
7 | 14 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 12 | 42.86% | 57.14% |
101.5
vs Brisbane Lions
(R21)
|
57.14% |
| 8 |
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
|
6 | 15 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 10 | 52.38% | 47.62% |
56.5
vs Port Adelaide Power
(R1)
|
52.38% |
| 9 |
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
|
17 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 15 | 6 | 71.43% | 28.57% |
61.5
vs Hawthorn Hawks
(R22)
|
47.62% |
| 10 |
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
|
9 | 12 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 16 | 23.81% | 76.19% |
60.5
vs Greater Western Sydney Giants
(R1)
|
47.62% |
| 11 |
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
|
11 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 13 | 38.10% | 61.90% |
61.5
vs West Coast Eagles
(R7)
|
47.62% |
| 12 |
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
|
13 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 11 | 47.62% | 52.38% |
61.5
vs Gold Coast Suns
(R18)
|
47.62% |
| 13 |
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
|
9 | 12 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 15 | 28.57% | 71.43% |
56.5
vs Geelong Cats
(R7)
|
47.62% |
| 14 |
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
|
0 | 21 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 10 | 52.38% | 47.62% |
45.5
vs Adelaide Crows
(R22)
|
42.86% |
| 15 |
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
|
8 | 13 | 1 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 42.86% | 57.14% |
92.5
vs Brisbane Lions
(R11)
|
38.10% |
| 16 |
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
|
19 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 11 | 10 | 52.38% | 47.62% |
50.5
vs Carlton Blues
(R18)
|
38.10% |
| 17 |
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
|
1 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 13 | 38.10% | 61.90% |
71.5
vs Melbourne Demons
(R5)
|
38.10% |
| 18 |
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
|
12 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 52.38% | 47.62% |
47.5
vs Geelong Cats
|
23.81% |
Bashers vs Bums
Punter Metric2026 results split by 2026 projected tier — who are the real bashers of bums?
Top 4
Fremantle Dockers, Sydney Swans, Brisbane Lions, Hawthorn Hawks
Bottom 4
Port Adelaide Power, West Coast Eagles, Essendon Bombers, Richmond Tigers
Bottom 8
Greater Western Sydney Giants, Carlton Blues, North Melbourne Kangaroos, Gold Coast Suns, Port Adelaide Power, West Coast Eagles, Essendon Bombers, Richmond Tigers
| # | Team | Tier | Overall | vs Top 4 | ATS | Avg Diff | Profile | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Fremantle Dockers
Proj 16W
|
Top 4 |
16-2
69.6%
|
3-0
100%
|
3-0
100%
|
+26 | Elite — Consistent | 1.25 |
| 2 |
Sydney Swans
Proj 13W
|
Top 4 |
13-5
56.5%
|
1-3
25%
|
2-2
50%
|
-13.5 | Basher of Bums | 0.42 |
| 3 |
Brisbane Lions
Proj 12W
|
Top 4 |
12-6
52.2%
|
1-2
25%
|
1-2
33.3%
|
-6.5 | Basher of Bums | 0.31 |
| 4 |
Hawthorn Hawks
Proj 12W
|
Top 4 |
12-5
52.2%
|
1-1
33.3%
|
0-2
0%
|
+0.7 | Basher of Bums | 0.56 |
| 5 |
Adelaide Crows
Proj 12W
|
Top 8 |
12-6
52.2%
|
1-3
20%
|
2-2
50%
|
-9.4 | Basher of Bums | 0.40 |
| 6 |
Melbourne Demons
Proj 12W
|
Top 8 |
12-6
52.2%
|
3-2
50%
|
4-1
80%
|
+1.8 | Consistent | 0.75 |
| 7 |
Western Bulldogs
Proj 11W
|
Top 8 |
11-7
47.8%
|
2-4
28.6%
|
3-3
50%
|
-20.3 | Basher of Bums | 0.38 |
| 8 |
Geelong Cats
Proj 10W
|
Top 8 |
10-8
43.5%
|
3-3
50%
|
4-2
66.7%
|
+7.7 | Giant Killer | 2.00 |
| 9 |
Collingwood Magpies
Proj 10W
|
Mid |
10-7
43.5%
|
0-3
0%
|
3-1
75%
|
-11 | Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
| 10 |
St Kilda Saints
Proj 8W
|
Mid |
8-10
34.8%
|
0-4
0%
|
1-3
25%
|
-23.4 | Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
| 11 |
Greater Western Sydney Giants
Proj 8W
|
Mid |
8-10
34.8%
|
3-2
50%
|
4-1
80%
|
+11.8 | Flat Track Loser | 1.50 |
| 12 |
Carlton Blues
Proj 8W
|
Mid |
8-10
34.8%
|
0-4
0%
|
2-2
50%
|
-25.3 | Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
| 13 |
North Melbourne Kangaroos
Proj 8W
|
Mid |
8-10
34.8%
|
0-3
0%
|
2-1
66.7%
|
-31.6 | Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
| 14 |
Gold Coast Suns
Proj 7W
|
Mid |
7-11
30.4%
|
0-5
0%
|
0-5
0%
|
-29.8 | Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
| 15 |
Port Adelaide Power
Proj 6W
|
Bot 4 |
6-12
26.1%
|
0-3
0%
|
3-0
100%
|
-6.8 | Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
| 16 |
West Coast Eagles
Proj 4W
|
Bot 4 |
4-14
17.4%
|
0-3
0%
|
1-2
33.3%
|
-41.6 | Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
| 17 |
Essendon Bombers
Proj 2W
|
Bot 4 |
2-16
8.7%
|
0-4
0%
|
0-4
0%
|
-43.2 | Consistent | — |
| 18 |
Richmond Tigers
Proj 2W
|
Bot 4 |
2-16
8.7%
|
0-4
0%
|
1-3
25%
|
-69.8 | Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
Punter Profile Guide