FOR ALL SEASON AFL RESULTS SELECT A TEAM

AFL

AFL 2026 Season Betting Analysis – ATS, Over/Under & Trends

Track the full AFL 2026 season with our progressive betting analysis. View ATS records, over/under trends, team form, and key betting edges as the season unfolds. Click any team to drill down into detailed game-by-game stats and performance data.

Generated at 2026-08-10 00:31:29

Refresh

Full Match — Favourites ATS

44.97%

Record: 85104

ATS
0%50%100%

Full Match — Totals

Over 46.56%

Overs: 88 | Unders: 101

1H Over: 0% (0/0)

O/U
UnderSplitOver

Biggest Spread Covered

logo Carlton Blues

Cover margin: 101.5

Peak

Best ATS Team

Melbourne Demons — 71.43%

Worst ATS: Gold Coast Suns — 23.81%

ATS% by Team

Ranked order

Over% by Team

How often team games went Over

Season Story

Refresh
AFL 2026 Season Review So Far

Through the current AFL campaign, full-match betting trends have painted a clear picture of inconsistency among favourites and a slight lean toward the under in totals. Favourites have posted just 85 covers against 104 losses for a 44.97 percent success rate. This underperformance has created value on underdogs throughout the season. On the totals side, overs have landed in 88 games while unders have hit in 101 contests, translating to a 46.56 percent over rate and 53.44 percent under rate. These figures suggest scoring has remained somewhat suppressed in many matchups, though several high-scoring outbursts have still occurred.

First-half totals markets are not available yet based on the data provided.

Melbourne Demons stand out as the clearest team to back against the spread this season. With a 71.43 percent ATS mark on a 15-6 record, the Demons have comfortably cleared the 52.38 percent threshold required to beat the bookies over a sustained period. Their success has come from a balanced approach, covering six times as favourites and seven times as underdogs. This level of consistency across 21 games has made them the most reliable ATS proposition in the competition at this stage of the season.

The Demons also fit the profile of a strong underdog team, entering games as the dog on ten occasions and securing seven of those wins. Their largest spread cover came in round 10 when they defeated the Hawthorn Hawks 120-81 as 16.5-point favourites, exceeding the spread by 55.5 points. Such performances highlight their ability to generate momentum across quarters and turn close contests into blowouts.

Other notable spread-covering events have further shaped the narrative. Carlton Blues delivered the season’s biggest cover to date, eclipsing the spread by 101.5 points in round 21 against the Brisbane Lions. Fremantle Dockers followed closely with a 99.5-point cover in round 13 versus North Melbourne. These lopsided results underscore the AFL’s capacity for sudden momentum shifts, where one dominant quarter can decide both the final margin and betting outcomes.

At the opposite end, Gold Coast Suns have struggled significantly, managing only a 23.81 percent ATS record. Their single win as an underdog across nine such opportunities illustrates the challenges some clubs face when installed as long shots. Meanwhile, teams like West Coast Eagles have shown resilience despite heavy underdog status on 18 occasions, covering the spread 12 times overall.

These ATS and totals trends carry direct implications for finals positioning. Clubs that have demonstrated quarter-by-quarter discipline, such as the Demons and Dockers, appear better equipped to handle the variance of September. With the season still unfolding, continued monitoring of favourite underperformance and under trends will remain central to identifying value in the weeks ahead.

Team Reviews

Search + click headers to sort

Rank Team (ATS L10 >) Rnd 22 Fav Dog Covers as Fav Wins as Dog Overs Unders Over% Under% Biggest Cover ATS%
1
L W W W W W W L W W
11 10 6 7 12 9 57.14% 42.86%
55.5
vs Hawthorn Hawks (R10)
71.43%
2
W W L W L W L W W L
18 3 11 2 11 10 52.38% 47.62%
99.5
vs North Melbourne Kangaroos (R13)
66.67%
3
L L W W L L W W W W
16 5 9 2 9 12 42.86% 57.14%
63.5
vs Western Bulldogs (R6)
61.90%
4
W L W L W L W W L W
11 10 5 3 10 11 47.62% 52.38%
59.5
vs Essendon Bombers (R7)
57.14%
5
W L L L W L L W W W
18 3 11 0 12 9 57.14% 42.86%
97.5
vs West Coast Eagles (R4)
57.14%
6
W W W L W W W L L L
3 18 1 3 8 13 38.10% 61.90%
46.5
vs Greater Western Sydney Giants (R10)
57.14%
7
W L W W L L L W W W
7 14 3 5 9 12 42.86% 57.14%
101.5
vs Brisbane Lions (R21)
57.14%
8
L L W L L W L L W W
6 15 2 4 11 10 52.38% 47.62%
56.5
vs Port Adelaide Power (R1)
52.38%
9
L W L W W W L W L W
17 4 7 3 15 6 71.43% 28.57%
61.5
vs Hawthorn Hawks (R22)
47.62%
10
L W L W L L W W L L
9 12 3 6 5 16 23.81% 76.19%
60.5
vs Greater Western Sydney Giants (R1)
47.62%
11
L W W L W W L W L L
11 10 7 1 8 13 38.10% 61.90%
61.5
vs West Coast Eagles (R7)
47.62%
12
W W L L L W W L W L
13 8 4 4 10 11 47.62% 52.38%
61.5
vs Gold Coast Suns (R18)
47.62%
13
L W L W W L W L L L
9 12 3 2 6 15 28.57% 71.43%
56.5
vs Geelong Cats (R7)
47.62%
14
L W L W W L L L W W
0 21 0 3 11 10 52.38% 47.62%
45.5
vs Adelaide Crows (R22)
42.86%
15
W L L W W W L L W L
8 13 1 6 9 12 42.86% 57.14%
92.5
vs Brisbane Lions (R11)
38.10%
16
W L W L L W W W L L
19 2 8 0 11 10 52.38% 47.62%
50.5
vs Carlton Blues (R18)
38.10%
17
L W L W L L W L L L
1 20 0 2 8 13 38.10% 61.90%
71.5
vs Melbourne Demons (R5)
38.10%
18
L L L L L L L L L W
12 9 4 1 11 10 52.38% 47.62%
47.5
vs Geelong Cats
23.81%

Bashers vs Bums

Punter Metric

2026 results split by 2026 projected tier — who are the real bashers of bums?

Top 4

Fremantle Dockers, Sydney Swans, Brisbane Lions, Hawthorn Hawks

Bottom 4

Port Adelaide Power, West Coast Eagles, Essendon Bombers, Richmond Tigers

Bottom 8

Greater Western Sydney Giants, Carlton Blues, North Melbourne Kangaroos, Gold Coast Suns, Port Adelaide Power, West Coast Eagles, Essendon Bombers, Richmond Tigers

# Team Tier Overall vs Top 4 ATS Avg Diff Profile Ratio
1
logo
Fremantle Dockers
Proj 16W
Top 4
16-2
69.6%
3-0
100%
3-0
100%
+26 Elite — Consistent 1.25
2
logo
Sydney Swans
Proj 13W
Top 4
13-5
56.5%
1-3
25%
2-2
50%
-13.5 Basher of Bums 0.42
3
logo
Brisbane Lions
Proj 12W
Top 4
12-6
52.2%
1-2
25%
1-2
33.3%
-6.5 Basher of Bums 0.31
4
logo
Hawthorn Hawks
Proj 12W
Top 4
12-5
52.2%
1-1
33.3%
0-2
0%
+0.7 Basher of Bums 0.56
5
logo
Adelaide Crows
Proj 12W
Top 8
12-6
52.2%
1-3
20%
2-2
50%
-9.4 Basher of Bums 0.40
6
logo
Melbourne Demons
Proj 12W
Top 8
12-6
52.2%
3-2
50%
4-1
80%
+1.8 Consistent 0.75
7
logo
Western Bulldogs
Proj 11W
Top 8
11-7
47.8%
2-4
28.6%
3-3
50%
-20.3 Basher of Bums 0.38
8
logo
Geelong Cats
Proj 10W
Top 8
10-8
43.5%
3-3
50%
4-2
66.7%
+7.7 Giant Killer 2.00
9
logo
Collingwood Magpies
Proj 10W
Mid
10-7
43.5%
0-3
0%
3-1
75%
-11 Basher of Bums 0.00
10
logo
St Kilda Saints
Proj 8W
Mid
8-10
34.8%
0-4
0%
1-3
25%
-23.4 Basher of Bums 0.00
11
logo
Greater Western Sydney Giants
Proj 8W
Mid
8-10
34.8%
3-2
50%
4-1
80%
+11.8 Flat Track Loser 1.50
12
logo
Carlton Blues
Proj 8W
Mid
8-10
34.8%
0-4
0%
2-2
50%
-25.3 Basher of Bums 0.00
13
logo
North Melbourne Kangaroos
Proj 8W
Mid
8-10
34.8%
0-3
0%
2-1
66.7%
-31.6 Basher of Bums 0.00
14
logo
Gold Coast Suns
Proj 7W
Mid
7-11
30.4%
0-5
0%
0-5
0%
-29.8 Basher of Bums 0.00
15
logo
Port Adelaide Power
Proj 6W
Bot 4
6-12
26.1%
0-3
0%
3-0
100%
-6.8 Basher of Bums 0.00
16
logo
West Coast Eagles
Proj 4W
Bot 4
4-14
17.4%
0-3
0%
1-2
33.3%
-41.6 Basher of Bums 0.00
17
logo
Essendon Bombers
Proj 2W
Bot 4
2-16
8.7%
0-4
0%
0-4
0%
-43.2 Consistent
18
logo
Richmond Tigers
Proj 2W
Bot 4
2-16
8.7%
0-4
0%
1-3
25%
-69.8 Basher of Bums 0.00

Punter Profile Guide

Elite — Consistent: Win rate ≥60% regardless of opponent Basher of Bums: Much better vs weak teams, ratio <0.5 Giant Killer: Punches up, ratio >1.5 Flat Track Loser: Weak overall AND worse vs bums Ratio: Top4 win% ÷ Bot4 win%