NFL 2025 Season Betting Analysis – ATS, Totals & Market Splits
Progressive ATS, totals, favourite/underdog, home/away and 1H form across the season. · Generated 2026-07-27 05:06:56
Games Settled
272
Home Win %
53.7%
Favourite ATS
47.6%
127-140
Over %
50.9%
138O · 133U
Avg Total
46.0
Biggest cover: Panthers 35.5
1H Fav ATS
48.1%
129-139
ATS% by Team
Over% by Team
Team Rankings
Search + click headers to sort
| # | Team (ATS L10 >) Wk 18 | Rec | ATS% | O/U% | Fav | Dog | Home ATS | Away ATS | 1H ATS | Big Cover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
|
14-3 | 12-5 · 70.6% | 9-8 · 53% | 13 | 4 | 50% | 89% | 59% | 23.5 vs Saints (W3) |
| 2 |
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
|
12-5 | 12-5 · 70.6% | 11-6 · 65% | 15 | 2 | 75% | 67% | 59% | 25 vs Jaguars (W7) |
| 3 |
W
L
W
P
L
W
L
W
W
W
|
14-3 | 11-5 · 68.8% | 11-6 · 65% | 11 | 6 | 50% | 88% | 71% | 23.5 vs Panthers (W4) |
| 4 |
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
|
12-5 | 11-6 · 64.7% | 9-7 · 56% | 12 | 5 | 50% | 78% | 53% | 16 vs Cardinals (W11) |
| 5 |
L
L
W
P
W
W
W
W
L
W
|
13-4 | 10-6 · 62.5% | 9-7 · 56% | 10 | 7 | 78% | 43% | 65% | 32 vs Chargers (W11) |
| 6 |
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
|
11-6 | 10-7 · 58.8% | 8-9 · 47% | 15 | 2 | 50% | 67% | 53% | 19.5 vs Raiders (W15) |
| 7 |
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
|
8-9 | 10-7 · 58.8% | 9-8 · 53% | 9 | 8 | 56% | 63% | 53% | 27 vs Raiders (W5) |
| 8 |
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
|
8-9 | 10-7 · 58.8% | 7-10 · 41% | 3 | 14 | 63% | 56% | 41% | 35.5 vs Falcons (W3) |
| 9 |
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
|
11-6 | 10-7 · 58.8% | 7-10 · 41% | 6 | 11 | 63% | 56% | 41% | 20.5 vs Browns (W15) |
| 10 |
L
L
W
P
W
L
L
P
W
W
|
4-13 | 8-7 · 53.3% | 10-7 · 59% | 2 | 15 | 50% | 56% | 56% | 24.5 vs Eagles (W6) |
| 11 |
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
|
8-9 | 9-8 · 52.9% | 8-9 · 47% | 6 | 11 | 38% | 67% | 63% | 19.5 vs Vikings (W2) |
| 12 |
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
|
6-11 | 9-8 · 52.9% | 6-11 · 35% | 4 | 13 | 38% | 67% | 25% | 18.5 vs Jets (W16) |
| 13 |
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
|
10-7 | 9-8 · 52.9% | 10-7 · 59% | 8 | 9 | 67% | 38% | 71% | 16.5 vs Bengals (W11) |
| 14 |
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
|
12-5 | 9-8 · 52.9% | 6-11 · 35% | 9 | 8 | 56% | 50% | 59% | 32.5 vs Ravens (W5) |
| 15 |
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
|
11-6 | 8-8 · 50.0% | 8-9 · 47% | 12 | 5 | 63% | 38% | 53% | 23.5 vs Vikings (W8) |
| 16 |
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
P
W
W
|
9-8 | 8-8 · 50.0% | 8-9 · 47% | 9 | 8 | 50% | 50% | 47% | 35 vs Bengals (W3) |
| 17 |
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
|
5-12 | 8-9 · 47.1% | 6-11 · 35% | 3 | 14 | 67% | 25% | 63% | 22.5 vs Dolphins (W7) |
| 18 |
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
|
6-11 | 8-9 · 47.1% | 9-8 · 53% | 6 | 11 | 44% | 50% | 53% | 25 vs Ravens (W13) |
| 19 |
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
|
7-10 | 8-9 · 47.1% | 9-8 · 53% | 6 | 11 | 56% | 38% | 59% | 31.5 vs Falcons (W8) |
| 20 |
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
|
9-8 | 8-9 · 47.1% | 10-7 · 59% | 11 | 6 | 50% | 44% | 53% | 25 vs Bears (W2) |
| 21 |
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
|
12-5 | 8-9 · 47.1% | 9-8 · 53% | 15 | 2 | 44% | 50% | 29% | 23.5 vs Panthers (W8) |
| 22 |
W
W
P
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
|
3-14 | 7-9 · 43.8% | 11-6 · 65% | 0 | 17 | 44% | 43% | 35% | 9.5 vs Browns (W10) |
| 23 |
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
|
14-3 | 7-9 · 43.8% | 7-10 · 41% | 12 | 5 | 56% | 29% | 41% | 17.5 vs Bengals (W4) |
| 24 |
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
|
7-9 | 7-10 · 41.2% | 11-6 · 65% | 10 | 7 | 50% | 33% | 47% | 23.5 vs Commanders (W7) |
| 25 |
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
|
3-14 | 7-10 · 41.2% | 7-10 · 41% | 3 | 14 | 44% | 38% | 41% | 12 vs Texans (W16) |
| 26 |
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
|
5-12 | 7-10 · 41.2% | 10-7 · 59% | 5 | 12 | 50% | 33% | 47% | 19.5 vs Chargers (W5) |
| 27 |
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
|
3-14 | 7-10 · 41.2% | 11-6 · 65% | 0 | 17 | 44% | 38% | 41% | 20 vs Chiefs (W16) |
| 28 |
L
L
P
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
|
9-7 | 6-10 · 37.5% | 9-8 · 53% | 15 | 2 | 50% | 25% | 47% | 11.5 vs Lions (W1) |
| 29 |
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
|
6-11 | 6-11 · 35.3% | 4-13 · 24% | 14 | 3 | 56% | 13% | 38% | 19.5 vs Ravens (W4) |
| 30 |
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
|
8-9 | 6-11 · 35.3% | 8-9 · 47% | 11 | 6 | 25% | 44% | 47% | 16 vs Saints (W8) |
| 31 |
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
|
8-9 | 6-11 · 35.3% | 9-8 · 53% | 14 | 3 | 22% | 50% | 44% | 21.5 vs Bengals (W15) |
| 32 |
W
L
L
P
L
L
L
L
L
L
|
3-14 | 5-11 · 31.3% | 10-7 · 59% | 3 | 14 | 14% | 44% | 47% | 12.5 vs Cowboys (W9) |
🔥 Hot Teams
Top of the league momentum board
❄️ Cold Teams to Fade
Bottom of the momentum board
Arizona Cardinals
L6 0-6 · Streak L9 · Pt Diff -98
Struggling both sides of the ball recently (34.2 allowed/G)
Indianapolis Colts
L6 0-6 · Streak L7 · Pt Diff -58
Struggling both sides of the ball recently (30.5 allowed/G)
Kansas City Chiefs
L6 0-6 · Streak L6 · Pt Diff -42
Struggling both sides of the ball recently (21.2 allowed/G)
New York Jets
L6 1-5 · Streak L5 · Pt Diff -131
Struggling both sides of the ball recently (35.3 allowed/G)
Momentum Board
Top 15 teams by momentum score (recent form + point differential, last 6 games)
Bashers vs Bums
Punter Metric2025 results split by season tier — how teams perform vs the Top 8 vs the Bottom 8.
Top 8
Seahawks
Patriots
Broncos
Jaguars
Rams
Bills
Texans
49ers
Bottom 8
Bengals
Commanders
Browns
Giants
Cardinals
Raiders
Titans
Jets
| # | Team | Tier | Overall | vs Top 8 (SU) | vs Top 8 (ATS) | vs Bot 8 (SU) | vs Bot 8 (ATS) | Profile | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Seattle Seahawks
|
Top 8 | 14-3 82.4% |
4-2 66.7% |
4-2 66.7% |
4-0 100% |
3-1 75% |
Giant Killer | 0.67 |
| 2 |
New England Patriots
|
Top 8 | 14-3 82.4% |
1-1 50% |
1-1 50% |
6-1 85.7% |
4-2 57.1% |
Basher of Bums | 0.58 |
| 3 |
Denver Broncos
|
Top 8 | 14-3 82.4% |
1-1 50% |
1-1 50% |
7-0 100% |
1-6 14.3% |
Basher of Bums | 0.50 |
| 4 |
Jacksonville Jaguars
|
Top 8 | 13-4 76.5% |
3-3 50% |
3-3 50% |
5-1 83.3% |
3-2 50% |
Basher of Bums | 0.60 |
| 5 |
Los Angeles Rams
|
Top 8 | 12-5 70.6% |
4-2 66.7% |
4-2 66.7% |
3-0 100% |
3-0 100% |
Giant Killer | 0.67 |
| 6 |
Buffalo Bills
|
Top 8 | 12-5 70.6% |
1-2 33.3% |
1-2 33.3% |
4-0 100% |
2-2 50% |
Basher of Bums | 0.33 |
| 7 |
Houston Texans
|
Top 8 | 12-5 70.6% |
3-4 42.9% |
3-4 42.9% |
4-0 100% |
2-2 50% |
Basher of Bums | 0.43 |
| 8 |
San Francisco 49ers
|
Top 8 | 12-5 70.6% |
2-4 33.3% |
2-4 33.3% |
5-0 100% |
4-1 80% |
Basher of Bums | 0.33 |
| 9 |
Philadelphia Eagles
|
Mid | 11-6 64.7% |
2-1 66.7% |
2-1 66.7% |
3-2 60% |
3-2 60% |
Elite – Consistent | 1.11 |
| 10 |
Los Angeles Chargers
|
Mid | 11-6 64.7% |
1-3 25% |
0-3 0% |
3-2 60% |
2-3 40% |
Basher of Bums | 0.42 |
| 11 |
Chicago Bears
|
Mid | 11-6 64.7% |
0-1 0% |
0-1 0% |
5-0 100% |
4-1 80% |
Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
| 12 |
Pittsburgh Steelers
|
Mid | 10-7 58.8% |
1-2 33.3% |
1-2 33.3% |
3-2 60% |
2-3 40% |
Balanced | 0.56 |
| 13 |
Detroit Lions
|
Mid | 9-8 52.9% |
0-1 0% |
0-1 0% |
4-0 100% |
3-1 75% |
Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
| 14 |
Green Bay Packers
|
Mid | 9-7 52.9% |
0-1 0% |
0-1 0% |
4-1 80% |
1-3 20% |
Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
| 15 |
Minnesota Vikings
|
Mid | 9-8 52.9% |
0-1 0% |
0-1 0% |
4-0 100% |
3-0 75% |
Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
| 16 |
Indianapolis Colts
|
Mid | 8-9 47.1% |
1-7 12.5% |
4-4 50% |
4-0 100% |
3-1 75% |
Basher of Bums | 0.13 |
| 17 |
Baltimore Ravens
|
Mid | 8-9 47.1% |
0-4 0% |
0-4 0% |
4-1 80% |
2-3 40% |
Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
| 18 |
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
|
Mid | 8-9 47.1% |
3-3 50% |
3-3 50% |
2-0 100% |
1-1 50% |
Basher of Bums | 0.50 |
| 19 |
Atlanta Falcons
|
Mid | 8-9 47.1% |
2-3 40% |
3-2 60% |
2-1 66.7% |
2-1 66.7% |
Balanced | 0.60 |
| 20 |
Carolina Panthers
|
Mid | 8-9 47.1% |
1-5 16.7% |
1-5 16.7% |
1-1 50% |
2-0 100% |
Basher of Bums | 0.33 |
| 21 |
Dallas Cowboys
|
Mid | 7-9 41.2% |
0-1 0% |
0-1 0% |
5-2 71.4% |
3-4 42.9% |
Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
| 22 |
Miami Dolphins
|
Mid | 7-10 41.2% |
1-3 25% |
2-2 50% |
3-2 60% |
3-2 60% |
Basher of Bums | 0.42 |
| 23 |
Kansas City Chiefs
|
Mid | 6-11 35.3% |
0-5 0% |
1-4 20% |
3-2 60% |
3-2 60% |
Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
| 24 |
New Orleans Saints
|
Mid | 6-11 35.3% |
0-5 0% |
1-4 20% |
3-1 75% |
3-1 75% |
Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
| 25 |
Cincinnati Bengals
|
Bot 8 | 6-11 35.3% |
1-3 25% |
3-1 75% |
2-2 50% |
1-3 25% |
Balanced | 0.50 |
| 26 |
Washington Commanders
|
Bot 8 | 5-12 29.4% |
0-2 0% |
1-1 50% |
3-0 100% |
3-0 100% |
Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
| 27 |
Cleveland Browns
|
Bot 8 | 5-12 29.4% |
0-3 0% |
1-2 33.3% |
2-3 40% |
3-2 60% |
Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
| 28 |
New York Giants
|
Bot 8 | 4-13 23.5% |
0-3 0% |
1-2 33.3% |
1-2 33.3% |
1-2 33.3% |
Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
| 29 |
Arizona Cardinals
|
Bot 8 | 3-14 17.6% |
0-8 0% |
1-6 12.5% |
0-2 0% |
0-2 0% |
Struggle vs Quality | — |
| 30 |
Las Vegas Raiders
|
Bot 8 | 3-14 17.6% |
1-4 20% |
5-0 100% |
1-3 25% |
1-3 25% |
Struggle vs Quality | 0.80 |
| 31 |
Tennessee Titans
|
Bot 8 | 3-14 17.6% |
0-9 0% |
3-6 33.3% |
2-1 66.7% |
2-1 66.7% |
Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
| 32 |
New York Jets
|
Bot 8 | 3-14 17.6% |
0-6 0% |
1-4 16.7% |
2-0 100% |
2-0 100% |
Basher of Bums | 0.00 |
Player Prop Leaders
Season statistical leaders (per-game averages). See Prop Betting Records below for Over/Under-vs-line hit rates.
Passing Yards
Rushing Yards
Receiving Yards
Prop Betting Records (vs posted line)
True Over/Under records — consensus prop lines settled against actual box scores. Anytime TD = scored a rushing/receiving TD.
Passing Yards
Over 49.7% (272-275)
Rushing Yards
Over 47.2% (792-886)
Receiving Yards
Over 46.0% (1638-1924)
Receptions
Over 45.0% (1548-1889)
Market Performance
Hit rate of the labelled side, with the dark tick at the 52.4% break-even needed to beat the vig. Bars that stop short of it had no edge; a red bar means fade to the other side.
Week-by-Week Tracker
How the key markets shifted week to week. Each point is that week in isolation; the dashed line is the 50% coin-flip mark.
| Week | Games | Fav ATS | Over | 1H Fav ATS | Home Win |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 1 › | 16 | 56.3% | 25.0% | 56.3% | 56.3% |
| Week 2 › | 16 | 56.3% | 62.5% | 53.3% | 43.8% |
| Week 3 › | 16 | 53.3% | 50.0% | 57.1% | 75.0% |
| Week 4 › | 16 | 50.0% | 60.0% | 62.5% | 68.8% |
| Week 5 › | 14 | 42.9% | 64.3% | 57.1% | 28.6% |
| Week 6 › | 15 | 40.0% | 40.0% | 60.0% | 60.0% |
| Week 7 › | 15 | 66.7% | 53.3% | 60.0% | 60.0% |
| Week 8 › | 13 | 84.6% | 61.5% | 69.2% | 61.5% |
| Week 9 › | 14 | 35.7% | 57.1% | 42.9% | 28.6% |
| Week 10 › | 14 | 35.7% | 50.0% | 28.6% | 57.1% |
| Week 11 › | 15 | 46.2% | 26.7% | 40.0% | 53.3% |
| Week 12 › | 14 | 30.8% | 28.6% | 35.7% | 64.3% |
| Week 13 › | 16 | 43.8% | 43.8% | 37.5% | 50.0% |
| Week 14 › | 14 | 42.9% | 85.7% | 57.1% | 42.9% |
| Week 15 › | 16 | 56.3% | 62.5% | 50.0% | 62.5% |
| Week 16 › | 16 | 33.3% | 62.5% | 25.0% | 37.5% |
| Week 17 › | 16 | 37.5% | 43.8% | 31.3% | 37.5% |
| Week 18 › | 16 | 43.8% | 43.8% | 46.7% | 75.0% |
Season Story
RefreshSeattle emerged as the clearest team to back against the number. The Seahawks posted a 12-5 ATS record at 70.59 percent, comfortably clearing the profitability line while going 9-4 ATS as favorites and adding two wins in four underdog spots. Their road performance stood out most, with an 8-1 ATS mark away from home compared to a flat 4-4 at home. Seattle also delivered several decisive covers, including a 23.5-point win over the Saints in Week 3.
At the other end of the spectrum, Arizona proved the most reliable fade. The Cardinals managed just a 5-11-1 ATS record at 31.25 percent, struggling especially at home where they covered only once in seven tries. Their poor straight-up record of 3-14 aligned with consistent failure to beat the closing number.
Carolina offered the clearest underdog profile. The Panthers received 14 underdog starts and secured seven wins in those spots while finishing 10-7 ATS overall. That resilience produced the season’s largest cover, a 35.5-point victory over Atlanta in Week 3 that underscored their ability to outperform expectations when installed as underdogs.
Jacksonville and New England also posted strong ATS marks above 62 percent, with the Jaguars covering five of seven underdog opportunities. The league-wide data showed that early-game form signals, such as first-quarter and first-half lead percentages for teams like New England and Seattle, often translated into sustained betting value rather than isolated surges. Overall, the season rewarded disciplined backing of road teams that exceeded market expectations while punishing sides that repeatedly fell short of the number.